|
|
|
By
Heber Taylor
| Permalink |
Comments (22)
In July, some residents of Colony Park in Galveston called, saying they thought City Councilman Tarris Woods was about to become a neighbor. They were interested because the neighborhood is in District 5 and Woods represents District 1.
Woods said he was still a resident of District 1 and planned to stay there. He said he, like others in public office, has bought property in various parts of town but has not changed his primary residence.
Since then, people have begun sending photographs to the newspaper. The photographs show Woods and his vehicle at the house in Colony Park. At least one of those sending the photographs left a note saying the newspaper should raise the question of Woods’ residency as an issue before the elections in May.
Woods is adamant that he is complying with the law. He says his residence at 812 37th St. is listed as his homestead. It’s the address on his driver’s license. He also said he’s being persecuted, perhaps because he is African-American. He said that several members of the council who are white own more than one piece of property and questions never seem to come up about them.
The Galveston Appraisal District records show the property on 37th Street is valued at $15,750 now and at $24,480 before Hurricane Ike. The property on Colony Park Circle is valued at $180,590, down from $323,630 before the storm. It’s in the name of the councilman’s wife. The appraisal district records list Woods’ homestead exemption on property at 504 Lennox Ave., which is valued at $11,360, down from $19,200 before the storm.
Woods said he thought complaints about his residency had been raised by Jan Coggeshall, a former mayor who has been interim president of the Colony Park neighborhood association. Coggeshall said she had welcomed Woods to the neighborhood. She said while neighbors had asked questions about whether his living in Colony Park would mean he would seek office in District 5, instead of District 1, she said she had no intention of trying to get Woods removed from office.
Woods says 812 37th St. is his legal residence. Residents of Colony Park say he lives at 1 Colony Park Circle.
Some say people should be outraged that Woods is not strictly following the charter — and a charter provision that was designed to ensure that minority communities were adequately represented. Others say Woods is complying with the law, and cite the example of state Rep. Craig Eiland, who has residences in Austin as well as Galveston, to show that people can be excellent representatives even though they spend some time outside their districts.
So who resolves this dispute? You’d think it might be the city, since the city charter requires that a council member reside in the district he or she represents. But Susie Green, the city attorney, says that someone seeking to remove a council member from office because of concerns about residency would have to file a complaint with the district attorney or the attorney general. Some kind of complaint could be filed with city’s Ethics Committee, but that panel has no authority to remove anyone from office.
That, to me, is one of the most interesting details in this story. If the residency rules were important enough to put in the charter, you’d think some kind of provision for enforcement would be there.
|
The difference between Woods and Eiland is: Eiland's wife lives in Austin full time and his kids are enrolled in schools there. The excuse that he needs to be there full time because he's Speaker Pro Tem is just that, an excuse.
— By J. Garcia
on Oct. 5 at 9:08 PM
|
|
I think I should also add; I'm pretty sure Woods intends to run again -- but I'm thinking Eiland is following in the steps of Kyle Janek.
Remember, after Janek moved his whole family to Austin & sold his house in Houston, he "resided" at his beach house for a few months -- which was still in his district -- before resigning from the Senate. I have a feeling that Eiland is planning the same thing -- and probably will not run again.
— By J. Garcia
on Oct. 5 at 9:27 PM
|
|
Is there an actual definition of "primary residence"? Is it where you spend the majority of your time or is it what's on your driver's license? That being asked the downtown business community could be MUCH better served by a council member from District 1 who actually has the best interests of the downtown business district in his/her heart. Right now there is NO representation.
— By Gerald Vimont
on Oct. 5 at 10:04 PM
|
|
I remember when Rudy Gonzales was on council. He lived in Texas City but claimed his residence was his ex-wife's home... Good times.
— By J. Garcia
on Oct. 5 at 11:03 PM
|
|
A Primary Residence is the one you claim a Homestead Exemption on.
— By Carl Glas
on Oct. 5 at 11:06 PM
|
|
So the Lenox property is his homestead and thus his primary residence and he says he has a homestead exemption on the other district 1 property but in July he moved to the Colony Park address where his wife lives? What has this confusion to do with his color? He did live in District 1 when he was elected right? He has made such a huge deal about bringing his constituents in District 1 'home' probably because the merchants downtown will not vote him in again. Being so politically savvy he is probably going to run for District 5 at the next election and that is why he moved.
Why not just go back to siccing code enforcement officers on him again which is how they harass the rest of us citizens. Didnt he have some problems with that in District 1? I think it is only fair to reveal the rest of the councils residence and property holdings at this time too. And also the sources of their income while you are giving us these very pertinent facts. Too bad the elections come after the FEMA money gets here and the barn doors are shut. My comments are based on this article and my personal opinions.
— By rosemary foote
on Oct. 6 at 2:17 AM
|
|
All this discussion is very interesting. The fact that councilmen/women can play games with residency and not live in the discrict they are responsible for raises ethical questions ---are those councilmen/women there for the districts residents or are they there for their personal gain? Not a hard question to resolve considering past history's discussions in these forums.
I think a more interesting question now is the basis Mr. Woods taxes were assessed on his properties.
— By Don Ray
on Oct. 6 at 8:53 AM
|
|
Residency is a state of mind. Legally your residence is where you intend it to be. Other issues are not significant to the legal authorities who have passed on this question. It may be fun to argue about, but it is a non-issue.
— By Beach Sand
on Oct. 6 at 9:06 AM
|
|
One thing, hypocrisy aside - if the Colony Park property is not homesteaded, one must wonder why Mr. Woods would give up thousands in taxes to remain a councilman in District 1.
I see no willingness on the part of most of our city leaders to plan and adhere to long term solutions to Galveston's problems, unless it includes selling out to developers who come in, destroy the natural beauty of the Island, take their profits, and leave. Still got to wonder about the perks and freebies to staff and elected officials.
The May election offers an opportunity for the people of Galveston to direct the future of the Island. They can and should demand candidate forums, where questions about everything from wetlands protection, to subsidized housing, to solutions to the lack of good jobs would be answered. Then hold the election winners accountable to their answers.
Finally, just because that's the way it's always been done doesn't mean it should continue. Unless we clean house and establish strict ethical guidelines, this sort of unethical behavior and sellout to big money will continue, and the Island will suffer.
— By R. Hill
on Oct. 6 at 9:12 AM
|
|
I love this town! Never a dull moment in small town politics.
Also love how minorities play the race card when things aren't going their way.
— By Just Me
on Oct. 6 at 9:20 AM
|
|
Bravo Mr. Hill! We need to adhere to strict ethical guidelines. Unless Tarris has leased the house to a tenant, I think it's safe to assume he's living there.
— By Soli DeoGloria
on Oct. 6 at 9:20 AM
|
|
Great post R. Hill !
— By Eddie Gomez
on Oct. 6 at 9:44 AM
|
|
You can homestead a residence where you reside on January 1. If he doesn't homestead Colony Park January 1 he is leaving money on the table. But then that is only one part of the equation. It's too bad many politicians enter public service with good intentions and then get sucked into the self interest game. And I'm not speaking specifically about Mr. Woods.
— By linda
on Oct. 6 at 10:01 AM
|
|
I may be missing something, but I don't see any homestead exemption listed in CAD for Tarris or Brenda. The primary issue is where Tarris is registered to vote. That determines eligibility. BTW, Texas law prohibits a couple from claiming dual homesteads - that is, one in his name and one in her name, unless legally separated. Doesn't matter whose name the house is in. Tarris may be correct on his residency claims, but I'll tell you, I am tired of his first response always being the race card. He has lost all credibility with me. I really wish Deborah had been elected, bless her.
— By Jackie Friedman
on Oct. 6 at 11:19 AM
|
|
SOOOO tired of the race card. Isn't there a regulation that states your Drivers License MUST reflect your home address? I know I had to change my license when I had to move after Ike. I think Tarris is just playing games as usual.
— By Jeff Modesitt
on Oct. 6 at 1:00 PM
|
|
In Texas, when a licensed driver moves from one address to another, they have 30 days to notify the Texas Department of Public Safety. Failure to do so is a violation of section 521.054 of the Texas Transportation Code. I did not see an exemption for Hyphenated-Americans or regular Americans.
— By Carl Glas
on Oct. 6 at 1:16 PM
|
|
Here is why such things are important. Depending on where Tarris lives or when he changed residencies or how in compliance he may or may not be (none of this do I know about or have any opinion on) it might be that from some point in time on, his vote and all of the issue he voted on could be nullified if someone pressed the point.
The moral to this story is that any elected or appointed official needs to be very careful about residency cause the issue is much larger then them personally. It is not unreasonable to argue that all votes after a certain point in time need to be thrown out. Can you imagine how long the next City council meeting would be?
Its kinda like finding the Crime lab did something wrong as some point. All the cases the lab worked on get called into question.
— By Bill Broussard
on Oct. 6 at 7:06 PM
|
|
Interesting how something as simple as the article we're talking about begins to grow. Now everyone who reads these forums is doubting Tarris.
We know nothing will happen, but the thought is there. I'm still wondering about the taxes he pays on his property. Is he paying what he should be paying? Is he paying a "special" tax just for councilmen/women? Makes me wonder!
— By Don Ray
on Oct. 6 at 8:39 PM
|
|
Bill. Briliant! (or is it brilliant Bill? LOL) I believe Councilman Woods' was the swing vote on the smoking ordinance following the famous spagetti western staredown on the issue of all or none.
Carpe Diem
— By robert strevell
on Oct. 7 at 7:25 AM
|
|
In Texas, residence is truly a state of mind. George Bush (42) claimed to be a Texas resident because he had leased a room at the Houstonian. He spent his time in Kennebunkport, Maine. Chet Brooks was Galveston's state senator for years, lived in Austin and claimed to live in Pasadena, in a house he leased to someone else. If you want to get rid of Tarris, either vote him out or change the law.
— By Elisa Vasquez
on Oct. 7 at 11:17 AM
|
|
When Councilman Woods claims homestead exemption on a $15,000 home and turns down the opportunity to claim exemption on a $180,000 home, he is leaving a lot of money on the table and raises the question why? Councilman Woods has the advantage of running in a district that was delibertly carved out to insure the election of a minority. This too raises eyebrows when he claims racism. Looks to me that Woods is fiooling the people and castign blame on anyone who challenges him.
— By Jack Cross
on Oct. 7 at 11:42 AM
|
|
Woods doesn't live in Dist. 1, that's what primary residence means...it means, "where you live"...not "where you sometimes visit", not "where you pay taxes and sometimes mow the grass"..it means, "where you live." It's really not that complicated folks. Of course he wants a nicer house and not live in his property in Dist.1..DUH..but he wanted to still have his title as councilmember too. Regardless of what's on his license, how he's got it homesteaded and whether his wife's name is on the property in Dist.5...all of that doesn't matter. It's not a shock at all to me that he gets away with it ...
— By Lorna Presswood Realtor
on Oct. 13 at 1:35 PM
|
You must be a registered member of The Daily News site to post a response. Enter your name and email address with your comments below to register. Include your password if you’re already a member.
You are responsible for the content that you post. Comments including profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will be removed. Please review the guidelines governing commentaries and discussions.
|